A Happy Mess.

With how messy my head has been lately with acronyms and pedagogies and webinar chatroom comments, you'd think I'd lost what my teaching style IS, but I think all of these Twitter-induced rabbit holes have only reaffirmed what I'm doing in the classroom and why.

Student voice and choice. Yep.
Empathy built in. Yes.
Creativity everywhere. Hells yeah.
Real-world applications. Mm hm.
  • PBL asks students to create their own projects and create their own daily tasks.
  • OEP asks students to write for the open movement, the creative network of the world. It demands: "Get rid of disposable assignments!"
  • TFT asks students to transfer what they are learning in one area to another.
  • Punk theory says, "Give students voice and choice."
  • OWI is all about access and inclusivity.
Some tweet the other day said that we should shy away from recipe assignments (14 slides, 7 sources, 4 transitions, 2 memes) because that's bad, and <insert their pedagogy here> says that we should give them the outcomes instead (I'm butchering the paraphrasing). What I got out of that whole deal was this: Start assigning projects like this CC course assigns projects.

What do I mean? Well, here's a screenshot of a current project of mine (the goal is to argue whether you are a stereotype/birth order or not):


And then here is a CC project description:


Notice the difference? And why shouldn't I just list the minimum pieces that should pop up and let the students determine how many sources and how many words? It sounds very hippie-dippy to me, but it also sounds like less stress on my end. The products that students could create are endless.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Three Ungrading Nuggets.

Intentionally Equitable Hospitality - IEH

Major Update!