A Happy Mess.
With how messy my head has been lately with acronyms and pedagogies and webinar chatroom comments, you'd think I'd lost what my teaching style IS, but I think all of these Twitter-induced rabbit holes have only reaffirmed what I'm doing in the classroom and why.
Student voice and choice. Yep.
Empathy built in. Yes.
Creativity everywhere. Hells yeah.
Real-world applications. Mm hm.
What do I mean? Well, here's a screenshot of a current project of mine (the goal is to argue whether you are a stereotype/birth order or not):
Student voice and choice. Yep.
Empathy built in. Yes.
Creativity everywhere. Hells yeah.
Real-world applications. Mm hm.
- PBL asks students to create their own projects and create their own daily tasks.
- OEP asks students to write for the open movement, the creative network of the world. It demands: "Get rid of disposable assignments!"
- TFT asks students to transfer what they are learning in one area to another.
- Punk theory says, "Give students voice and choice."
- OWI is all about access and inclusivity.
What do I mean? Well, here's a screenshot of a current project of mine (the goal is to argue whether you are a stereotype/birth order or not):
And then here is a CC project description:
Notice the difference? And why shouldn't I just list the minimum pieces that should pop up and let the students determine how many sources and how many words? It sounds very hippie-dippy to me, but it also sounds like less stress on my end. The products that students could create are endless.
Comments
Post a Comment